a compilation of statements and articles:
Statement of the UP History Department:
"MALAKAS AT MAGANDA: Marcos Reign, Myth-Making and Deception in History"
Matakot sa kasaysayan pagkat walang lihim itong di nahahayag.
(Fear history for it respects no secrets.)
--Gregoria de Jesus, Lakambini ng Katipunan
The darkness of dictatorship descended upon the Philippines when
Ferdinand E. Marcos declared martial law in 1972 and the dictator ruled
the nation with impunity.
Great danger now lurks behind a
deceptive nostalgia for a past that never really existed--that the
Marcos years were a period of peace and prosperity. This is patently
Marcos myth and deception. Under martial law, the country was plunged
into a climate of repression and plunder and then into a social crisis
that exploded in the 1980s.
Marcos myth-making and deception
are not new. Martial law itself was set up by grand deception. Marcos
raised the Red scare to justify martial rule, but the communist movement
then was still in its infancy; it was in fact under martial law that
the communist and Moro rebellions grew in leaps and bounds. Marcos
claimed to break up an old oligarchy, but martial law instead created a
new type under his control, a crony oligarchy. Marcos also couched his
dictatorship in deceptive legalese--“constitutional authoritarianism,”
but it only served his yearning for perpetuity in power. The fact is
martial law rudely preempted the 1971 constitutional convention, which
sought to prohibit Marcos from extending his hold on power. He
thereafter ruled for 14 years until he was ousted.
To prop up
authoritarian control, the Marcos propaganda machine contrived
deceptive images of Philippine society as in the slogans “New Society”
and “City of Man,” which sought to paint a picture of a “compassionate
society”; but Imelda Marcos actually put up whitewashed fences to hide
urban blight and squalor from foreign tourists. The Marcoses also
portrayed themselves in the likenesses of the legendary personae of
Malakas at Maganda in the Filipino origin myth, which made them appear
as fount of life in murals and photographic visuals. But the
dictatorship actually engendered some of the darkest and direst years of
Philippine history.
Economic crises characterized the Marcos
years, as economists have consistently revealed, the most telling
indicator was the extent of poverty. Poverty incidence grew from 41% in
the 1960s to 59% in the 1980s. Vaunted growth was far from inclusive and
driven by debt, which further weighed down on the nation. From 1970 to
1983, foreign debt increased twelve times and reached $20 billion (Dr.
Manuel Montes, 1984). It grew at an average rate of 25% from 1970 to
1981. Much went to unproductive expenses like the Bataan Nuclear Plant,
which was unsound and wasteful.
The Marcos regime then
imposed an International Monetary Fund debt-repayment program that
resulted in new taxes, massive lay-offs and a towering inflation that
stood at 54% in 1984. While wages nominally rose by 29%, prices
increased by 92% and the economy declined by 5.5% in 1984.
BusinessWorld Research (2016) reckoned for 1984 the highest misery index
(inflation + unemployment rates) between 1966 and 2015. From the
mid70s, the situation resulted in the massive outflow of labor overseas.
The grinding poverty of the majority showed in a sharp increase in two
areas, infant mortality and insurgency. Crime rates increased; rebellion
surged.
Even as inflation cut away at the allocations for
health and education, there was an obvious increase in the military
budget. Government also increased its contribution to government
corporations held by favored friends. Monopolies were created in the
sugar and coconut industries that pampered a select group. Marcos
cronies made a lot of money through behest loans, which were repaid by
tax money. Meantime the international media documented shopping sprees,
not to mention lavish parties, by the Marcoses that gave scandal due to
the scale of wanton spending. Marcos thus earned an infamous Guinness
entry as a man believed to have stolen the most from a single country.
To say then that EDSA interrupted our becoming like Singapore is a big
joke, a malicious lie. Marcos had mismanaged the economy; it was in
shambles long before the EDSA revolt. From 1970 to 1980, among East
Asian and Southeast Asian countries, the Philippines registered the
lowest GDP per capita at 3.4% (An Analysis of Economic Crisis, ed. Dr.
Emmanuel de Dios, 1984).
Peace and order, a spurious claim, actually
meant an iron-fisted clampdown on civil liberties. Through presidential
decree and executive order backed by the full force of the military
apparatus, Marcos padlocked Congress, jailed the opposition, gagged
media, emasculated unions, and banned student councils. Thousands were
jailed without warrant and due process, not to mention countless
killings and disappeared. Yet the national crime rate climbed
continuously from 183 in 1976 to 279 (per 100,000) in 1980 (De Dios, ed.
1984 citing Philippine Constabulary data). In 14 long years,
repression had also stunted the growth of independent-minded new leaders
from the younger generation.
Today the Filipino people
continue to seek peace and prosperity as the social structuress that
gave rise to inequities, debt-dependence, poverty, corruption, human
rights violations, rebellion, and criminality have remained after the
EDSA revolt. What we ought to do is to expand the spaces for people
empowerment and inclusive socio-economic development, uphold selfless
public service, seek truth and justice in all corridors of government,
render our obligations to Inang Bayan, and make sure that the tyranny of
the past will never be written out of history.
We need to
critically evaluate the past so that we do not blindly look for
solutions to problems of underdevelopment from those who prospered under
the dictatorship or those who allow the same sources of social
inequities and injustice. We enjoy greater freedoms today precisely
because we fought the Marcos regime and the purveyors of Marcos values
that, once in the past, bled this nation dry.
The sad thing
indeed that could happen is to fall for the trap of seeking a better
society from a mythical “golden” past. In that past, Marcos myth-making
served to hide the power grab and greed of a Malakas at Maganda. Today
Marcos deception seeks to evade accountability.
We reject deception and demand accountability!
Department of History
College of Social Sciences and Philosophy
University of the Philippines
Diliman, Quezon City
March 28, 2016
UP history profs slam 'mythical' golden era under martial law
By Rosette Adel (philstar.com) |
Updated March 30, 2016 - 6:57pm
http://www.philstar.com/headlines/2016/03/30/1567657/history-profs-slam-mythical-golden-era-under-martial-law The professors of the University of the Philippines (UP) History
Department on Wednesday issued a statement clarifying that the martial
law era under late President Ferdinand Marcos is not a period of peace
and prosperity.
The professors decried that the distortion of history is a "deceptive
nostalgia" that never really occurred, citing that the darkness of
dictatorship started when Marcos declared martial law in 1972.
“The darkness of dictatorship descended upon the Philippines when
Ferdinand E. Marcos declared martial law in 1972, and the dictator ruled
the nation with impunity,” the professors said.
“Great danger now lurks behind a deceptive nostalgia for a past that
never really existed—that the Marcos years were a period of peace and
prosperity. This is patently Marcos myth and deception. Under martial
law, the country was plunged into a climate of repression and plunder
and then into social crisis that exploded in the 1980s,” it added.
The professors warned the voters to not fall for the myth describing
the Marcos years as the country's “golden age." The statement denounced
the deception and demanded accountability from the Marcoses.
“The sad thing indeed that could happen is to fall for the trap of
seeking a better society from a mythical ‘golden’ past. In that past,
Marcos myth-making served to hide the power grab and greed of a Malakas
at Maganda. Today, Marcos deception seeks to evade accountability. We
reject deception and demand accountability!” the statement read.
They further explained that even economists know about the extent of poverty during the martial law era.
“Economic crises characterized the Marcos years, as economists have
consistently revealed the most telling indicator was the extent of
poverty. Poverty incidence grew from 41 percent in the 1960s to 59
percent in the 1980s,” the professors said.
“Vaunted growth was far from inclusive and driven by debt, which
further weighed down on the nation. From 1970 to 1983, foreign debt
increased twelve times and reached 520 billion. It grew at an average
rate of 25 percent from 1970 to 1981,” they cited.
In a televised interview, vice presidential candidate Sen. Ferdinand
Marcos Jr. said EDSA interrupted the growth of Philippine economy that
could have led to development similar to Singapore’s.
“Kung walang EDSA, baka para tayong Singapore ngayon. Bakit ko
sinasabi ‘yun? Sinasabi ko ‘yun dahil pareho ang mga basic na services
na dinadala ng Singapore, pareho ang mga sektor na dini-develop ng
Singapore,” Bongbong said.
“Two-thirds ng utang natin ngayon ay dito sa administrasyon na ito
kaya’t papaano nila gagawin na hindi katumbas talaga dun sa kanilang
sinasabi 'yung kanilang talagang ginagawa?” the senator added.
The UP professors responded by saying Marcos Jr.’s statement is a
“big joke” and a “malicious lie,” citing that the country posted the
lowest gross domestic product during the Marcos years.
“To say then that EDSA interrupted our becoming like Singapore is a
big joke, a malicious lie. Marcos had mismanaged the economy; it was in
shambles long before the EDSA revolt. From 1970 to 1980, among East
Asian and Southeast Asian countries, the Philippines registered the
lowest GDP at 3.4 percent,” they said.
On March 2, more than 400 professors of the Ateneo de Manila
University also released a statement condemning the "willful
distortion" of the country's history saying the Marcos era is a golden
past. They described the twisting of history as “shameless refusal to
acknowledge the crimes of the martial law regime.”
Ateneo profs condemn historical distortion of Marcos era
By Patricia Lourdes Viray (philstar.com) |
Updated March 3, 2016 - 4:06pm
More than 400 professors of the Ateneo de Manila University (ADMU) on
Wednesday condemned the "willful distortion" of the country's history.
"We deplore the shameless refusal to acknowledge the crimes of the
Martial Law regime," the Ateneo community said in a statement signed by
412 faculty member and formators.
This statement is in response to the call of vice presidential
aspirant Sen. Ferdinand "Bongbong" Marcos Jr. that judgement about his
late father's administration should be left to history teachers and
students.
The Ateneo professors stressed that the dictatorship of the late
President Ferdinand Marcos was one of the darkest periods of Philippine
history.
"We condemn, in strongest possible terms, attempts by some
individuals and particularly public figures, to whitewash the Marcos
regime's wanton violation of human rights and to distort its
political-economic record," the statement read.
The ADMU statement also called on those who are running for office in
the May 9 elections to take a definite stand on the human rights
violations during the Marcos era.
"We challenge them to join our call never again to allow the
conditions of tyranny to take root in our society," the statement read.
The statement also expressed its opposition against any attempt to give Marcos a hero's burial at the Libingan ng mga Bayani.
In his speech during the 30th anniversary of the EDSA People Power
Revolution last week, President Beingno Aquino III stressed that the
Marcos regime was
not the country's "golden age."
"Napapailing na nga lang po ako, dahil may mga nagsasabi raw na ang
panahon ni Ginoong Marcos ang siyang golden age ng Pilipinas," Aquino
said.
Environmental advocates against the return of the Marcoses to Malacañang
http://bulatlat.com/main/2016/04/20/environmental-advocates-against-the-return-of-the-marcoses-to-malacanang/
This unity statement was signed on April 19, at the Environmental
Gathering Against The Return of the Marcoses to Malacanang held at
Balay Kalinaw, University of the Philippines Diliman in Quezon City.
We, environmental advocates and organizations, unite against the
return of the Marcoses to Malacañang. We are campaigning against the bid
of Senator Bongbong Marcos to be the vice president in the coming May
2016 election.
During the martial law years (1972-1986), the dictator Ferdinand
Marcos implemented policies and projects which wrought massive
environmental pollution and destruction. The Revised Forestry Code of
the Philippines, for instance, led to massive deforestation and
commodification of our forest resources. From 1965 to 1986, seven
million hectares of our forests were lost because of Marcos’ timber
licensing agreements.
Despite strong opposition from communities, the Marcos government
constructed the first dirty coal power plant in 1983, the Calaca
Coal-Fired Plant in Batangas. Up to the present, locals continue to bear
the brunt of the displacement and pollution caused by the power plant.
Marcos attempted to implement numerous corrupt-laden and extremely
hazardous projects such as the Bataan Nuclear Power Plant (BNPP), the
Chico River Dam Project in Kalinga, and the Kaliwa-Kanan Dam in Rizal.
These attempts were derailed because of the strong people’s
resistance. Environmental heroes and martyrs like Kalinga chieftain
Macliing Dulag and Calaca fisherfolk leader Erning Castillano sacrificed
their lives in the struggles against these destructive projects
.
The environmental crimes committed during the dictatorship are bound
to happen again if Bongbong gets one step closer to Malacañang. Until
now, Bongbong and the rest of the Marcoses have refused to admit or show
remorse over their sins and crimes in the past.
Bongbong is linked to entities that have unscrupulous environmental
records. Jose Singson Jr., one of the major donors of Marcos’ 2010
senatorial bid, is suspected of harbouring applications and ongoing
operations of illegal and destructive magnetite mining operations in the
Ilocos region. His relatives, the Romualdezes, are one of the biggest
large-scale mining elites in the country. Sen. Marcos has promised to
give more incentives to corporate mining once he takes on the vice
presidency.
The gargantuan personal funding of Marcos is suspected to have been
seeded by their $10-billion ill-gotten wealth, some of which are likely
sourced from the various destructive mining and other extractive
projects during the dictatorship.
Thus, the growing consensus across the Philippine environmental
movement is that the unrepentant environmental criminals that are the
Marcos dynasty should never again be allowed to return to power.
Protect our environment!
Oppose the return of Marcoses to Malacanang!
NO VOTE for Bongbong Marcos!
Signatories:
Envi Vote Alliance
Amianan Salakniban
BUKAL Batangas
Center for Environmental Concerns
Citizen Disaster Response Center
GreenResearch
Kalikasan PNE
NILAD
PUSOD Inc.
SIBAT
UP Minggan
UP Saribuhay
AGHAM
AGHAM Youth
BAYAN NCR
Hustisya
CARMMA
KADAMAY
PALAMAKAYA
Marcos deception seeks to evade accountability—UP Dept. of History